Under current law, medical practitioners and other employees providing services to patients under Medicare and Medicaid are required to be Covid-19 vaccinated, unless they have a medical exemption. These regulations were enacted to protect those patients who might be in the care of a hospital, nursing home or under professional home care. The rule was additionally implemented to help save the lives and mitigate the deficit of medical providers across the country, as that community was hit with infection. This bill would end the vaccine requirement and prohibit one in the future.
Debate on this bill was fraught with vaccine disinformation and anti-vaxxer sentiment from the Republican supporters, and passed on a largely party-line vote. Molinaro voted FOR this bill.
H.R. 382 would terminate the state of emergency that was instituted under the former President to handle Covid. This bill was moot due to President Biden's prior announcement that the state of emergency would be lifted mid-year to allow for a careful and efficient realignment of pandemic services (including the movement of millions of Americans off of Medicaid), but Republican sponsors decided to move the bill for immediate termination nonetheless.
This was the first time Molinaro spoke on the floor of the House, and you can read his comments in the record above (click to enlarge). Constituents will immediately recognize the tone and message, and critics would note his lack of recognition that the state of emergency was already in the process of being lifted. Molinaro voted FOR this bill, which passed along party lines.
This vote was taken to accelerate and consolidate voting for several Covid-related bills Molinaro voted FOR the resolution twice in party-line votes. He also voted against two motions to send the day's legislation to committee for review, also resolved in party-line votes.
The House voted unanimously to approve this bill that permits a delay in the liquidation of an investment security if the company reasonably believes the redemption involves the financial exploitation of a senior or individual age 18 or older who is unable to protect his or her own interests.
Today concluded voting on amendments to the Strategic Production Response Act (H.R. 21), and a vote was taken on the bill itself. As noted, this bill is largely a messaging platform and is highly unlikely to be passed into law. In summary, H.R. 21 requires the Federal government to increase the amount of public land available to lease for oil and gas extraction in the same percentage as any drawdown in the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR). It is seen as an attack on President Biden's decision to use SPR oil to help decrease U.S. gas prices when they were at their peak. If this bill were to pass, it could increase energy prices in the short term.
All amendments that were voted on January 27 are listed at the bottom of this post. Congressman Molinaro voted "NO" on each, except for one vote that he skipped. Since Molinaro did not support any amendments, it's difficult to understand his analysis, but it is worth noting that Molinaro opposed amendments to:
He voted FOR the bill itself.
Significant Amendments
No. 67 - Eliminates the requirement to issue new leases on federal land if oil producers export more petroleum than was drawn down from the SPR. This helps to keep supply in the US high and prevent oil companies sending production from new Federal leases overseas. On keeping American energy for use in America, MOLINARO VOTED NO
Nos. 63, 81 - Requires that the Secretary of Energy publish an analysis of the number of unused current leases available to oil and gas drillers on Federal land prior to issuance of new leases that would remove more land from public use. The amendment sponsor identified 9,000 unused leases on 26 million acres of public land. MOLINARO VOTED NO
No. 24 - Prohibits new H.R. 21 drilling leases within 3,200 feet of a home, school or hospital. On the question of protecting these areas, MOLINARO VOTED NO
No. 135 - Prohibits new H.R. 21 drilling leases on the Outer Continental Shelf off the coast of New York and neighboring states. MOLINARO VOTED NO on protecting these waters.
No. 145 - Prohibits new H.R. 21 drilling leases on protected lands, such as National Parks, the National Wildlife Refuge System, and national conservation areas. MOLINARO VOTED NO on protecting these lands.
No. 92 - Prevents oil and gas companies that participated in price gouging in 2021-2022 from acquiring leases offered under H.R. 21. MOLINARO VOTED NO on the amendment, choosing to permit these companies to acquire H.R. 21 leases.
No. 58 - Requires that the Secretary of Energy determine that any delay in releasing SPR oil due to new rules in H.R. 21 does not negatively impact consumers who use oil to heat their homes. MOLINARO VOTED NO
No. 46 - Permits immediate SPR drawdowns to protect national security. MOLINARO VOTED NO
No. 59 - States that nothing in H.R. 21 prohibits the President from drawing petroleum from the SPR to reduce gas prices. MOLINARO VOTED NO
No. 60 - Ensures that H.R. 21 does not increase consumer gas prices by causing a delay in a release from the SPR. MOLINARO VOTED NO
No. 77 - Allows an SPR release without delay if a delay would increase inflation. MOLINARO VOTED NO
No. 36 - Permits the SPR to continue to conduct test releases to maintain readiness. MOLINARO VOTED NO
No. 74 - Excludes any companies that have executed stock buybacks in the last ten years from participating in H.R. 21 lease purchases. MOLINARO VOTED NO
No. 131 - Prohibits the sale of H.R. 21 drilling leases in the Great Lakes, which - to this point - have been protected from oil and gas production. MOLINARO SKIPPED THE VOTE
Nos. 72 and 73 - Requiring that this bill support U.S. environmental goals and not increase its greenhouse gas emissions. MOLINARO VOTED NO
No. 66 - Requires that any oil and gas company that secures a new lease under this bill would provide a plan for reducing pollution and greenhouse gases. MOLINARO VOTED NO
No. 32 - Requires that the Secretary of Energy determine H.R. 21 would not increase energy prices for U.S. consumers. MOLINARO VOTED NO
Other Amendments
No. 35 - Ensures that the SPR will continue to provide short-term "loans" of oil during temporary disruptions that are quickly replaced. MOLINARO VOTED NO
No. 61 - Permits SPR drawdowns that are profitable and eliminates requirements for new leases in those cases. MOLINARO VOTED NO
No. 84 - Requires the Secretary of Energy certifiy that any new leases will not "perpetuate environmental injustice." MOLINARO VOTED NO
No. 76 - States that nothing in H.R. 21 controverts "the fact that communities of color and low-wealth communities face the greatest harms due to climate change." MOLINARO VOTED NO
No. 70 - Prohibits new H.R. 21 drilling leases in the offshore Mid-Atlantic planning area. MOLINARO VOTED NO
No. 75 - Prohibits new H.R. 21 drilling leases in Big Cypress National Preserve. MOLINARO VOTED NO
No. 27 - Prohibits new H.R. 21 drilling leases on the Outer Continental Shelf. MOLINARO VOTED NO
No. 79 - Prohibits new H.R. 21 drilling leases off the Washington/Oregon coast is they would affect fishing areas. MOLINARO VOTED NO
No. 68 - Limits new H.R. 21 drilling leases to oil only, and not natural gas. MOLINARO VOTED NO
No. 25 - Excludes land from H.R. 21 leasing that is unlikely to have oil or gas deposits. MOLINARO VOTED NO
No. 68 - Prohibits oil companies from exercising certain tax benefits and participating in H.R. 21 lease purchases. MOLINARO VOTED NO
No. 64 - Encourages the Department of Energy to restock the SPR with oil produced domestically. MOLINARO VOTED NO
No. 4 - Prohibits H.R. 21 drilling leases in areas that have significant numbers of abandoned oil and gas wells that still require remediation. MOLINARO VOTED NO
Today's voting activity was entirely comprised of votes on amendments to H.R. 21 - The Strategic Production Response Act. This bill is largely a messaging platform and is highly unlikely to be passed into law. In summary, H.R. 21 requires the Federal government to increase the amount of public land available to lease for oil and gas extraction in the same percentage as any drawdown in the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR). It is seen as an attack on President Biden's decision to use SPR oil to help decrease U.S. gas prices when they were at their peak.
The bill is problematic in a number of ways, including the fact that there is substantial unexploited Federal land already available for oil and gas production, the fact it carves out exceptions for severe emergencies (which circumstances around the war in Ukraine would likely qualify) and the fact that the percentage drawdown in SPR and percentage increase in leasable land are two numbers that have no logical connection to each other.
Below are all of the amendments that were voted on January 26. Additional amendments are scheduled for January 27.
Significant Amendments
No. 71 - Requiring that this bill support U.S. environmental goals and not undermine the country from meeting its greenhouse gas reduction target. On the question of supporting climate goals, MOLINARO VOTED NO
No. 33 - Proposed by Congresswoman Boebert, this amendment expands the amount of Federal land made available for drilling under this legislation from 300 million acres to 450 million acres. For perspective, New York state is approximately 35 million acres in size. On the question of increasing drillable land to 450 million acres, MOLINARO VOTED YES
No. 89 - Prohibits any party awarded new drilling leases under H.R. 21 from price gouging U.S. consumers by selling new production at excessive prices. MOLINARO VOTED NO
No. 104 - Proposed by New Jersey Congressman Pallone, prohibits new H.R. 21 drilling leases from the coastline area of Northeastern states including New York due to the dangers to the fishing and tourism industries, and lack of public support. On the question of protecting the New York coastline, MOLINARO VOTED NO
No. 3 - Proposed by Florida Congresswoman Castor, prohibits new H.R. 21 drilling leases from the coastline area of Florida, which has been the subject of a drilling moratorium for several years. Florida citizens reaffirmed their opposition to drilling in a recent state referendum. On the question of protecting the Florida coastline, MOLINARO VOTED NO
No. 65 - This amendment would prohibit any new leases awarded under this legislation from decreasing the land and water available for outdoor recreation. MOLINARO VOTED NO
No. 21 - Prohibits any leases awarded under H.R. 21 that would not provide a fair return for taxpayers. On the question of protecting taxpayers from "sweetheart" deals for drillers, MOLINARO VOTED NO
No. 50 - Requires that the Secretary of Energy certify that increased drilling leases are required to replenish the SPR to 2022 levels before awarding H.R. 21 leases. MOLINARO VOTED NO
No. 53 - Would prohibit leases that would lead to higher greenhouse gas emissions. MOLINARO VOTED NO
No. 55 - Would require consultation with Native American tribes for drilling that would impact their land. MOLINARO VOTED NO
No. 129 - Limits new leases on Federal land to those operations that would not negatively impact air quality. On the question of protecting air quality, MOLINARO VOTED NO
Other Amendments
No. 133 - Affirms that this law would not invalidate existing drilling moratoriums. MOLINARO VOTED YES
No. 2 - Prohibits the President from declaring an energy crisis. MOLINARO VOTED NO
No. 44 - Delays implementation of this bill until the Department of Energy furnishes a report. MOLINARO VOTED NO
No. 29 - Prohibits new H.R. 21 drilling leases from the coastline area of Virginia. MOLINARO VOTED NO
Nos. 15, 26 and 18 - Prohibits new H.R. 21 drilling leases from the coastline area of Northern, Central and Southern California. MOLINARO VOTED NO
No. 7 - Prohibits new H.R. 21 drilling leases from the coastline area of Washington and Oregon. MOLINARO VOTED NO
No. 56 - Prohibits new leasing that would result in or exacerbate disproportionate burdens on communities of color, low-income communities, and Tribal and Indigenous communities. MOLINARO VOTED NO
No. 57 - Prohibits leasing new land that is viable for renewable energy production. MOLINARO VOTED NO
No. 85 and 86 - Requires that the Secretary of Energy ensure that China, Russia, Iran and North Korea do not benefit from leases granted under H.R. 21. MOLINARO VOTED YES
Molinaro voted FOR these three bills that passed the House with wide margins.
H.R. 346 establishes an FAA task force to recommend improvements to the air traffic alert system for pilots.
H.R. 400, introduced by Democrat Representative Judy Chu, authorizes certain banking entities to invest up to 15% of their capital and surplus small business investment companies. The current limit is 5%.
H. Res. 7 commends the bravery of Iranian citizens who are protesting their government's attacks on free expression and civil liberties.
Molinaro voted FOR two bills that passed the House easily. They were the only two votes for January 24.
H.R. 300 requires that information concerning civil settlements entered into by the government are logged into a public database. It passed unanimously.
H.R. 159 permits hiring managers within the government to substitute work experience or a skills test for a college degree when considering applicants for some positions. It passed 422-2.
Molinaro voted FOR this bill that would prevent oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) from being sold to China.
Largely a messaging bill rather than a practical one, H.R. 22 prohibits the sale of SPR oil to China. As a fully fungible commodity, it may be impossible to track SPR oil as it makes its way through the global marketplace and this bill provides no mechanism to do so. It is worth noting that US oil companies legally export approximately 250 million barrels of oil directly to China each year, which is significantly more than the total drawdown in the SPR in 2022.
Molinaro voted FOR this bill that looks to undermine the availability of abortions in New York and other states. It is a violation of his stated promise that he would not support legislation that superseded or conflicted with New York's existing laws. Molinaro has said to the press that accusations he'd vote for abortion-restricting laws are "lies" since he believes regulation of abortion must be left to the states.
As background, this bill regulates a practice that is essentially nonexistent. It seeks to ensure that "infants born alive after an abortion receive the same protection of law and degree of care as any newborn." Most news reports about this issue report that experts have never heard of any case similar to those prohibited by the bill.
It's fair to say that three days into his first week, Molinaro has breached the most critical of his campaign promises, and broke any trust built with constituents who believed that he would legislate as "a moderate" on abortion.
Molinaro voted FOR this resolution that has no legislative impact. It is largely a list of vandalization reports at anti-abortion centers, political offices and two churches. The bill suggests that these events are explicitly or implicitly connected to protests of the Dobbs decision restricting abortion.
The resolution is otherwise innocuous, except for unnecessary poison pills that are likely insulting to many in the NY-19 District. The resolution disparages pro-choice Americans as "anti-life," criticizing "radical anti-life advocates." The resolution also contains the language: ". . . recognizes the sanctity of life and the important role pro-life facilities, groups, and churches play in supporting pregnant women, infants, and families;" Of course, those Americans who seek to protect choice do not believe that "pro-life groups" who seek to eliminate the right to abortion "[support] pregnant women, infants, and families." And "sanctity of life" is a well-known phrase co-opted to mean "anti-abortion."
Molinaro voted FOR the "Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party" in a widely expected vote that was voted unanimously by Republicans and drew support from most Democrats.
Molinaro voted FOR this highly partisan Jim Jordan-led committee, which is expected to attempt to undermine ongoing DOJ/FBI investigations, including those concerning Republican members of Congress who were engaged in the insurrection on January 6 and subsequently sought pardons from former President Trump. It will oppose domestic terrorism investigations and also has a mandate to undermine the CIA and IRS.
Cosponsored by Marjorie Taylor Green and defended on the floor by "Chaos Caucus" members Lauren Boebert, Dan Bishop, Chip Roy, Scott Perry, Thomas Massie and Andrew Clyde, this was a concession made to the far-right McCarthy holdouts. This vote was the first that Molinaro made for the MAGA/Qanon sect of his conference.
Marc Molinaro Voted for Kevin McCarthy as Speaker four more times until McCarthy was finally elected speaker after making significant concessions to the far-right. Of note, although Molinaro tweeted a roundly criticized, misleading statement about gas prices and a joke about Utica, he made no direct acknowledgement of the anniversary of the January 6th insurrection or the great sacrifices made by those who now protect him and his staff. A quote was subsequently noted in a local Upstate paper.
NY-19 Congressman-Elect voted for Kevin McCarthy as Speaker five more times in a half-day session, bringing the total to eleven. He then voted to adjourn until tomorrow.
Molinaro has not made any public comments about the unprecedented delay in beginning productive legislative work.
Marc Molinaro Voted for Kevin McCarthy as Speaker three additional times before the House adjourned until 8pm. No Speaker was elected. However, Molinaro appears to be having fun and meeting new people.
In his first official acts in the Capitol, Marc Molinaro Voted for Kevin McCarthy as Speaker three times today before the House adjourned.
House Republican Majority Leader-Elect Steve Scalise has laid out a legislative agenda for the "First Two Weeks" of GOP control. Here's what we know about Marc Molinaro's positions on these bills.
This bill is in direct conflict to Marc Molinaro's promises made during the campaign to protect New Yorkers' abortion rights. Among other restrictions, this bill would eliminate abortion coverage from all New York marketplace insurance and Medicaid plans. It would prevent many New York employers from choosing to provide insurance that covers abortions for employees.
While there had been accurate criticism during the special election campaign about Marc Molinaro's apparent lack of clarity on the issue of abortion access, he has since committed to passing no law that would restrict access in New York, as this bill would.
Expected Molinaro Vote Based on Campaign: NO
Expected Molinaro Vote Based on Political Reality: NO
This "sense of the House" resolution has no legislative impact. It is largely a list of vandalization reports at anti-abortion centers, political offices and two churches that are explicitly or implicitly connected to protests of the Dobbs decision restricting abortion.
The resolution is innocuous, except for the inclusion of this poison pill: ". . . recognizes the sanctity of life and the important role pro-life facilities, groups, and churches play in supporting pregnant women, infants, and families;" Of course, those Americans who seek to protect choice do not believe that "pro-life groups" who seek to eliminate the right to abortion "[support] pregnant women, infants, and families." And of course, "sanctity of life" is a phrase co-opted to mean "anti-abortion."
What will Marc Molinaro do? Hard to call this one. We have not found any record of him expressing any concern about attacks on abortion providers or supporters. He has also said that the Federal government should be hands-off as it relates to abortion. However, it's likely that he votes as instructed on this resolution. Molinaro is unlikely to subsequently provide balanced support for abortion providers or proponents, and this will be the start of him working around promises made to constituents on the abortion issue.
Expected Molinaro Vote Based on Campaign: PROBABLY NOT
Expected Molinaro Vote Based on Political Reality: PROBABLY YES
This bill is the strangest one in the platform, regulating a practice that is essentially nonexistent. It seeks to ensure that "infants born alive after an abortion receive the same protection of law and degree of care as any newborn." Most news reports about this issue report that experts have never heard of this procedure actually happening. The writer of this website doesn't know what hidden anti-abortion landmines are in this bill, but on its face, it appears to be mostly a political stunt.
But what does it mean for Marc Molinaro? He has committed to opposing Federal regulation of abortion, calling it an overstep of states' rights. On this basis, he would be expected to vote against this bill. However, this may be another early betrayal of his campaign commitments.
Expected Molinaro Vote Based on Campaign: NO
Expected Molinaro Vote Based on Political Reality: UNCLEAR
According to House Republicans, this bill rescinds "billions of dollars allocated to the IRS for 87,000 new IRS agents." That's not entirely true.
The GOP bill defunds all allocations from the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) to the IRS for all purposes. These funds were to be used primarily for customer service, replacing IRS employees lost to attrition and enhanced auditing on people making over $400,000.
Molinaro has not indicated a specific position on this bill, although he committed to analyzing the impact of all legislation on constituents. We are not aware of any data he has received relative to the decreased ability of the IRS to assist NY-19 constituents, or the impact of wealthy tax noncompliance on middle-class families in NY-19. On the other hand, he did misrepresent both the intent and the specifics of the IRS component of the IRA during the campaign, and would not be expected to be more truthful or educated about it today.
Expected Molinaro Vote Based on Campaign Promises: PROBABLY YES
Expected Molinaro Vote Based on Political Reality: YES
The text of this bill reads: " The sole authority of the Select Committee shall be to investigate and submit policy recommendations on the status of the Chinese Communist Party’s economic, technological, and security progress and its competition with the United States."
This proposed committee is clearly redundant with other oversight already occurring and it is more important to focus on China overall rather than its main political party, but it appears that "Anti-Communism" is a drum the House Republican conference will continue to beat throughout the term. There is no cost impact disclosed with this bill, which suggests that Molinaro would vote against it, but he has used Red Scare language throughout the campaign, and this will speak to his base.
Expected Molinaro Vote Based on Campaign: YES
Expected Molinaro Vote Based on Political Reality: YES
"Prohibits non-emergency drawdowns of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) without a plan to increase energy production on federal lands."
This bill would more appropriately be called the "Unintended Consequences Act." If passed, the White House would be required to open federal land and waters to oil extraction by the same percentage that the SPR was depleted, to a maximum of a 10% increase in leased land.
As a practical matter, this is a straightforward effort to provide more drilling rights for large oil companies, without any legislative need. The SPR will be restocked starting in January at lower prices than the oil was sold for - there has been only positive impact on the country and consumers. If passed, the probable result is that the Executive Branch would hold back a significant percentage of drilling lands for lease in order to maintain flexibility for the mandated increases under this bill.
Nevertheless, Marc Molinaro has been a strong advocate for oil and gas drilling, including fracking in New York State. His largest source of corporate contributions is Gas Land Petroleum. He would be expected to support this bill.
Expected Molinaro Vote Based on Campaign: YES
Expected Molinaro Vote Based on Political Reality: YES
This ineffective bill "Prohibits the Secretary of Energy from sending petroleum products from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) to China."
US oil companies have been selling oil to China for decades. 2022's exports will rank among the highest in history. When an American company buys oil from the SPR, it becomes fungible, and indistinguishable from other oil they produce domestically. This bill will not reduce exports to China but will require new regulation and recordkeeping to maintain the fiction that SPR oil does not contribute to Chinese consumption, or to our exports to that country.
Expected Molinaro Vote Based on Campaign: NO
Expected Molinaro Vote Based on Political Reality: YES
According to its sponsors, this bill creates requirements for District Attorneys to report data about how many cases prosecutors receive, plea bargain and decline to prosecute. It also requires reporting about bail and recidivism. The specific charges covered are a mix of violent and nonviolent offenses and do not include drug charges.
Much of this data is already reported in many states, although there is likely significant variability in format. The result will be distorted politically, but the reporting requirements will not have an impact on NY-19 constituents other than the District Attorneys' time and financial cost of complying.
Marc Molinaro has been a good advocate for disclosure and - although it's not clear at this time how this data specifically will be will weaponized - will want to continue to assist Republicans with their crime messaging.
Expected Molinaro Vote Based on Campaign: YES
Expected Molinaro Vote Based on Political Reality: YES
This "sense of the House" resolution has no legislative impact and is a potpourri of Republican law enforcement talking points. Some are bland, others wildly partisan. Here's the likely stickiest sticking point:
"Unity Molinaro" would be critical. He campaigned: "Our community needs a proven leader in the House of Representatives, one with a track record of working to find solutions, not stoke the deep division that continues to keep our state and nation from reaching its fullest."
But "Political Molinaro" has long misrepresented Democrats' views on police funding. He has apparently disavowed his prior support for and participation in civil rights actions and this will likely be the first of many times he betrays the promise to not be "Team Red or Team Blue."
Expected Molinaro Vote Based on Campaign: PROBABLY
Expected Molinaro Vote Based on Political Reality: YES
This bill is sponsored by Republican Congressman Chip Roy, who is known for being one of only three opponents to the Emmitt Till Antilynching Act, and - along with Marjorie Taylor Greene - one of two Congressmembers to attempt to delay the award of gold medals to the Capitol Police for their January 6th service.
There are two halves to this proposed law. The first provides the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) an option to freeze immigration for refugees and migrants. The second requires that the DHS freeze immigration for refugees, asylees and migrants if they cannot be imprisoned or sent back to Mexico or Canada pending immigration proceedings. It would bind the US government from meeting its refugee and asylum obligations, which our country had failed to achieve - by a substantial margin - under the Trump administration.
Over the years, Marc Molinaro has pushed back weakly on the child separation scandal and offered words of encouragement for Syrian refugees but has not taken a strong stand on the issue. Although closing our borders to asylum-seekers and refugees would be against his stated morality, he will likely vote with the party.
Expected Molinaro Vote Based on Campaign: PROBABLY
Expected Molinaro Vote Based on Political Reality: YES
The devil is in the details, but this bill appears to be a relatively straightforward enforcement enhancement to require that NICS report to ICE any application to purchase a firearm by people who are in the country illegally. This will catch far more visa overstays than people who have crossed the border illegally, which is likely not the intent of the sponsor.
Although Marc Molinaro resists gun restrictions, it is unlikely he would object to these.
Expected Molinaro Vote Based on Campaign: YES
Expected Molinaro Vote Based on Political Reality: YES
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.