About Us

H.R 140 creates dangerous limitations on the government to prevent disinformation online, threatening rank-and-file federal employees with fines and termination if they request or encourage social media platforms to correct false information that puts Americans in danger.

This bill was originally borne from Republican campaign promises to investigate Hunter Biden and fight the deplatforming of its most extreme voices that posted false information about voting, vaccines or expressed racism and anti-Semitism. It creates dangerous restrictions on how the government can respond to false information online.

The bill outlaws censorship by government employees and defines "censorship" as follows:

The term ‘censor’ or ‘censorship’ means influencing or coercing, or directing another to influence or coerce, for—

“(A) the removal or suppression of lawful speech, in whole or in part, from or on any interactive computer service;

“(B) the addition of any disclaimer, information, or other alert to lawful speech being expressed on an interactive computer service; or

“(C) the removal or restriction of access of any person or entity on an interactive computer service generally available to the public, unless such person or entity is engaged in unlawful speech or criminal activities on such service"

So, what does this mean? It would restrict the government from demanding that Twitter remove insulting posts, as the Trump White House attempted during his administration. However, it goes well beyond those clear misuses of governmental authority to impose dangerous restrictions on public safety and election security.

For example:

• H.R. 140 makes it illegal for the government to ask social media platforms to investigate or restrict malign fake accounts with purchased "blue checks" that claim to represent federal agencies or the military
• H.R. 140 prohibits the Nuclear Regulatory Commission from correcting a false emergency alert about a radiation release at Indian Point
• H.R. 140 terminates any FEMA employee that contacts Facebook or Twitter to correct deliberate misinformation about hurricane evacuations, how to find disaster response resources or reconnect with family
• H.R. 140 would fine election officials who seek to correct false postings by enemy states on social media about voting locations or hours

Even those federal employees who are not in violation of this statute would certainly be chilled in their lawful actions to correct disinformation online, which is the intent of the bill's authors. The term "influencing" in the definition of censorship remains broad enough such that it forces rank-and-file government employees to make a decision to risk their employment and a $5,000 fine in order to effectively do their jobs.

H.R. 140 will presumably not pass the Senate, which will resolve the threats that this bill poses. However, voters in NY-19 are likely to begin questioning why they need to repeatedly be saved by the Senate from the votes of a Congressman who promised to be moderate and deliberative.

This bill passed by a fully party-line vote, 219-206. Molinaro voted FOR this bill.

The Biden administration largely reinstated certain Obama-era environmental protection laws that were rolled back by the Trump administration. H.J. Res 27 attempts to revert these environmental protections once again to the weaker and more permissive guidelines from the Trump administration. 

In a nutshell, the Clean Water Act seeks to protect American water resources from pollution, maintain their physical integrity and ensure that the flora and fauna that depend on the waters is protected to the extent practicable. It's a base set of statutes that have protected the environment for over 50 years. At the end of the Trump administration, he had the EPA change the determinations for what would be protected, exempting a significant portion of previously-protected waters in order to prioritize economic development. The Trump rules were then thrown out by a Federal judge that said they'd cause significant environmental harm.

The rules created under Biden are consistent with the governing Clean Water rules that had existed before the Trump presidency. Notwithstanding that history, development and mining industry lobbyists - including those associated with Molinaro - have made an aggressive attempt to return to the Trump rules invalidated by Federal courts.

Molinaro voted FOR the resolution, and for a return to the weaker Trump-era regulations. This bill passed by a largely party-line vote, 227-198, with a handful of Democrats voting FOR, and moderate Republican Brian Fitzpatrick voting AGAINST.

Molinaro had voted FOR the same resolution in committee, which passed there in a largely party-line vote of 30-24 .

H.Res. 76, which removes Congresswoman Ilhan Omar from the Foreign Affairs Committee, is widely understood to be a retaliation bill for the removal of Paul Gosar and Marjorie Taylor Greene from committees in the prior congress. Gosar was penalized for Twitter posts that depicted the murder of a Congresswoman, and Greene was removed for calling for Speaker Nancy Pelosi's execution, as well as trafficking in Qanon, racist and anti-Semitic rhetoric prior to her election.

The resolution condemns statements Omar has made in the past as either anti-Semitic or anti-Israel.  Molinaro voted FOR the resolution to remove Omar from the Foreign Affairs Committee. He defended the vote in a comment to the Daily Freeman that her prior comments about Jews and Israel were disqualifying.

However, Omar has apologized for comments that were seen as anti-Semitic, which appears to have resolved any tensions with the broad Jewish community, as the resolution for her removal was opposed by almost all Jewish members of Congress. The Jewish community has been far more critical of Marjorie Taylor Greene's appearance at a conference hosted by neo-Nazi Nick Fuentes last year - a controversy Molinaro has never expressed concern over.

Omar has not generally retreated from her criticisms of Israel, which would not appear to be cause for removal from committees, as members of the Foreign Affairs committee - like fellow New York Republican Claudia Tenney - frequently criticize both allies and adversaries. 

Molinaro received some criticism of his own on his Facebook post that defended his vote, and this appears to be another circumstance where he's fallen in line with the edges of the party instead of navigating a moderate path.  The resolution passed on an entirely party-line vote. As mentioned above, Molinaro voted FOR this bill.

For more background, read:  The GOP Attack on Ilhan Omar Trivializes Antisemitism

Widely derided as political theatrics. H.Con.Res. 9 condemns several historical leaders of socialist or communist countries and denounces socialism in America.

In half-hearted debate, opponents pointed out that leaders of some of America's greatest allies were socialist, including the Allies of World War II and Israel. Additionally, observers wondered aloud whether the final line of the resolution, "That Congress . . . opposes the implementation of socialist policies in the United States of America" was part of the expected attack on Social Security and Medicare by Republicans. 

Molinaro voted FOR this bill, which passed. He later tweeted attacks on those opposed to 2023's strangest resolution to date. He was mocked by constituents for the post and did not respond further.

Under current law, medical practitioners and other employees providing services to patients under Medicare and Medicaid are required to be Covid-19 vaccinated, unless they have a medical exemption. These regulations were enacted to protect those patients who might be in the care of a hospital, nursing home or under professional home care. The rule was additionally implemented to help save the lives and mitigate the deficit of medical providers across the country, as that community was hit with infection. This bill would end the vaccine requirement and prohibit one in the future.

Debate on this bill was fraught with vaccine disinformation and anti-vaxxer sentiment from the Republican supporters, and passed on a largely party-line vote. Molinaro voted FOR this bill.

H.R. 382 would terminate the state of emergency that was instituted under the former President to handle Covid. This bill was moot due to President Biden's prior announcement that the state of emergency would be lifted mid-year to allow for a careful and efficient realignment of pandemic services (including the movement of millions of Americans off of Medicaid), but Republican sponsors decided to move the bill for immediate termination nonetheless. 

This was the first time Molinaro spoke on the floor of the House, and you can read his comments in the record above (click to enlarge). Constituents will immediately recognize the tone and message, and critics would note his lack of recognition that the state of emergency was already in the process of being lifted. Molinaro voted FOR this bill, which passed along party lines.

This vote was taken to accelerate and consolidate voting for several Covid-related bills Molinaro voted FOR the resolution twice in party-line votes. He also voted against two motions to send the day's legislation to committee for review, also resolved in party-line votes.

Molinaro voted FOR this bill that looks to undermine the availability of abortions in New York and other states. It is a violation of his stated promise that he would not support legislation that superseded or conflicted with New York's existing laws. Molinaro has said to the press that accusations he'd vote for abortion-restricting laws are "lies" since he believes regulation of abortion must be left to the states.

As background, this bill regulates a practice that is essentially nonexistent. It seeks to ensure that "infants born alive after an abortion receive the same protection of law and degree of care as any newborn." Most news reports about this issue report that experts have never heard of any case similar to those prohibited by the bill. 

It's fair to say that three days into his first week, Molinaro has breached the most critical of his campaign promises, and broke any trust built with constituents who believed that he would legislate as "a moderate" on abortion.

Molinaro voted FOR this resolution that has no legislative impact. It is largely a list of vandalization reports at anti-abortion centers, political offices and two churches. The bill suggests that these events are explicitly or implicitly connected to protests of the Dobbs decision restricting abortion.

The resolution is otherwise innocuous, except for unnecessary poison pills that are likely insulting to many in the NY-19 District. The resolution disparages pro-choice Americans as "anti-life," criticizing "radical anti-life advocates." The resolution also contains the language: ". . . recognizes the sanctity of life and the important role pro-life facilities, groups, and churches play in supporting pregnant women, infants, and families;" Of course, those Americans who seek to protect choice do not believe that "pro-life groups" who seek to eliminate the right to abortion "[support] pregnant women, infants, and families." And "sanctity of life" is a well-known phrase co-opted to mean "anti-abortion."

Molinaro voted FOR the "Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party" in a widely expected vote that was voted unanimously by Republicans and drew support from most Democrats.

Molinaro voted FOR this highly partisan Jim Jordan-led committee, which is expected to attempt to undermine ongoing DOJ/FBI investigations, including those concerning Republican members of Congress who were engaged in the insurrection on January 6 and subsequently sought pardons from former President Trump. It will oppose domestic terrorism investigations and also has a mandate to undermine the CIA and IRS.

Cosponsored by Marjorie Taylor Green and defended on the floor by "Chaos Caucus" members Lauren Boebert, Dan Bishop, Chip Roy, Scott Perry, Thomas Massie and Andrew Clyde, this was a concession made to the far-right McCarthy holdouts. This vote was the first that Molinaro made for the MAGA/Qanon sect of his conference.

Molinaro voted FOR the House Rules Package, which contains some procedural and benign components, but also some very consequential and controversial aspects.

In particular, the Package calls for interference in DOJ prosecutions of Trump and other participants in anti-democracy crimes; weakening the ethics committee; likely partisan attacks on Dr. Anthony Fauci, vaccine researchers and other health officials; and expedited floor votes on anti-abortion legislation. 

Many of these elements are items he campaigned against, others are contrary to the consensus views of the 19th District. This was Molinaro's first partisan vote.

The first bill brought to the House floor in the 118th Congress was HR 23, which would rescind funding previously provided to the IRS to improve technology, enhance customer service, hire employees across the organization to replace retirements and improve enforcement for underpaying/nonpaying high income and corporate filers. Molinaro voted FOR this bill.

The nonpartisan congressional budget office determined that this bill would increase the Federal deficit by over $100 billion. 

Congressman Molinaro and others have misled constituents about the IRS funding, falsely claiming that it would be used to hire 87,000 IRS agents, or increase audits on the middle class. That's been consistently debunked.

While Molinaro was expected to support this bill due to his misrepresentations (or misunderstandings) of the previously-passed IRS funding, HR 23 betrays his campaign promises to advocate for reduced deficits and balanced budgets.